From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:01:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4AE9CA85.9080409@hp.com> References: <4AE72079.4030504@simula.no> <4AE7262B.1060703@gmail.com> <4AE83FE4.1050309@nets.rwth-aachen.de> <58396856-6D7E-4CE1-8D66-D1F11205B0D5@simula.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= , Arnd Hannemann , Eric Dumazet , Netdev , LKML , shemminger@vyatta.com, David Miller To: Andreas Petlund Return-path: Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.35]:42170 "EHLO g1t0028.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756011AbZJ2RB4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:01:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <58396856-6D7E-4CE1-8D66-D1F11205B0D5@simula.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Just how thin can a thin stream be when a thin stream is found thin? (to the cadence of "How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?") Does a stream get so thin that a user's send could not be split into four, sub-MSS TCP segments? rick jones