From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:47:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEB26BB.1050007@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030104201.6bb03b23@nehalam>
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> The ethtool operation to blink LED can take an indeterminately long time,
> blocking out other operations (via rtnl_lock). This patch is an attempt
> to work around the problem.
>
> It does need more discussion, because it will mean that drivers that formerly
> were protected from changes during blink aren't. For example, user could
> start device blinking, and then plug in cable causing change netlink event
> to change state or pull cable and have device come down.
>
> The other possibility is to do this on a driver by driver basis
> which is more effort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c 2009-10-30 10:27:23.621917624 -0700
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c 2009-10-30 10:35:53.787670774 -0700
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -781,6 +782,8 @@ static int ethtool_get_strings(struct ne
> static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> {
> struct ethtool_value id;
> + int err;
> + static int busy;
>
> if (!dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -788,7 +791,21 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_de
> if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - return dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id(dev, id.data);
> + if (busy)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + /* This operation may take a long time, drop lock */
> + busy = 1;
> + dev_hold(dev);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id(dev, id.data);
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> + dev_put(dev);
> + busy = 0;
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
It seems reasonable, but why have a global 'busy' flag, and not
private to each netdev ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-30 17:42 RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-30 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-30 18:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-31 16:44 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-02 8:17 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 16:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-02 18:29 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEB26BB.1050007@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).