From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:13:16 +0300
Message-ID: <4AF0023C.5010404@bigtelecom.ru>
References: <20091103093333.GB6718@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.bigtelecom.ru ([87.255.0.61]:40314 "EHLO
	mail.bigtelecom.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756364AbZKCKNN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:13:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20091103093333.GB6718@ff.dom.local>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change,
> especially this part:
>=20
> http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D124453482324409&w=3D2
>=20
> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure
> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better
> tool...
>=20
> Best regards,
> Jarek P.
>=20
> PS: Slavon, (as usual ;-) wrap the lines and don't top post, please.
>=20
>=20

These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel?

As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by=20
correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to
correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal=20
has forgotten.
It is possible to receive once again full =D0=BF=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=87=D1=81=
=D0=B5=D1=82 for the test?

Best regals, Slavon