Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

[Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>]

Jarek Poplawski пишет:
> On 03-11-2009 11:13, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
>>> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change,
>>> especially this part:
>>>
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=124453482324409&w=2
>>>
>>> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure
>>> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better
>>> tool...
>> These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel?
>>
>> As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by 
>> correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to
>> correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal 
>> has forgotten.
>> It is possible to receive once again full ???°N~?N~?N~???N~? for the test?
> 
> There were a few iproute changes, tested enough I guess. Alas, I
> didn't keep them (they could be found around with link above).
> 
> But it's not about your testing. I meant: since nobody noticed
> something was (still) wrong with 1G scheduling, why bother with 10G?
> 

Ok. In next week we get server and test it :)


> Best regards,
> Jarek P.
> 
> PS: ...and don't remove me from CC, please ;-)
> 
> 

Sorry. My mail server have limit CC :)