From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Badalian Vyacheslav Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:13:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4AF01050.6080308@bigtelecom.ru> References: <20091103105413.GD6718@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Patrick McHardy , Linux Netdev List To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from mail.bigtelecom.ru ([87.255.0.61]:59421 "EHLO mail.bigtelecom.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750850AbZKCLNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:13:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091103105413.GD6718@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jarek Poplawski =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On 03-11-2009 11:13, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: >>> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change= , >>> especially this part: >>> >>> http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D124453482324409&w=3D2 >>> >>> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure >>> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better >>> tool... >> These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel? >> >> As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by=20 >> correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to >> correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal=20 >> has forgotten. >> It is possible to receive once again full ???=C2=B0N~?N~?N~???N~? fo= r the test? >=20 > There were a few iproute changes, tested enough I guess. Alas, I > didn't keep them (they could be found around with link above). >=20 > But it's not about your testing. I meant: since nobody noticed > something was (still) wrong with 1G scheduling, why bother with 10G? >=20 Ok. In next week we get server and test it :) > Best regards, > Jarek P. >=20 > PS: ...and don't remove me from CC, please ;-) >=20 >=20 Sorry. My mail server have limit CC :)