netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: Avoid rounding errors for 100%.
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:19:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF06617.6030804@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091103090752.5b462128@nehalam>

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:19:45 +0100
> Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> 
>> Although the patch makes sense,
>> it does not fix the bug/effect we were seeing.
>> A netem reorder percentage of 100% will still get packets reordered.
>> (if the netem queue is not empty)
>>
>>
>> hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
>>>
>>> We noticed that a netem reorder percentage of 100% will still get packets reordered.
>>> This patch fixes that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
>>> ---
>>>  tc/tc_util.c |    6 ++++--
>>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tc/tc_util.c b/tc/tc_util.c
>>> index fe2c7eb..2641f2e 100644
>>> --- a/tc/tc_util.c
>>> +++ b/tc/tc_util.c
>>> @@ -363,8 +363,10 @@ int get_percent(__u32 *percent, const char *str)
>>>  		return -1;
>>>  	if (*p && strcmp(p, "%"))
>>>  		return -1;
>>> -
>>> -	*percent = (unsigned) rint(per * max_percent_value);
>>> +	if (per == 1.)
>>> +		*percent = max_percent_value;
>>> +	else
>>> +		*percent = (unsigned) rint(per * max_percent_value);
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>
> 
> If you don't want reordering, don't specify reordering?

Are you arguing against the correctness of my patch?

Regarding, the reordering thingy/bug/effect whatever:
We would like to specify reordering with something like this:
Please delay 1% of the packets with 5ms.

We thought that would be possible with
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 5m reorder 99%

But unfortunately it is not. Any better idea?

Best regards,
Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-03 15:38 [PATCH] iproute2: Avoid rounding errors for 100% hannemann
2009-11-03 16:19 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-11-03 17:07   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-03 17:19     ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2009-11-03 18:05       ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF06617.6030804@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --to=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).