From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ryousei Takano <ryousei@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:03:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF10B1D.4050604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b30d1c3b0911031913k2c922935vc9605b76ac43168f@mail.gmail.com>
Ryousei Takano a écrit :
> Hi Patrick and Stephen,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> I retried on the newer kernel and iproute2, and added the experimental result
> on my page. Please see 'Experimental result 2':
> http://code.google.com/p/pspacer/wiki/HTBon10GbE
>
> The accuracy improves compared with the previous experiment.
> The difference reduces from +810 Mbps to +430 Mbps.
> It is because the timer resolution improves from 1 usec to 1/64 usec.
> But it is not perfect.
>
Hmm, do you know part of the error comes from the user tool itself ?
If you check iperf results at sender and receiver you'll see different
values, sender lies a bit.
Tried here on a Gbit link (I dont have 10Gbe yet)
$ ./iperf.bench.sh
.100 104
.200 206
.300 307
.400 413
.500 515
.600 610
.700 715
.800 822
.900 913
1.000 945
while on receiver :
[ 4] 0.0- 5.3 sec 62.8 MBytes 100 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0- 5.1 sec 123 MBytes 202 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 0.0- 5.1 sec 183 MBytes 303 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0- 5.1 sec 246 MBytes 409 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 0.0- 5.0 sec 307 MBytes 511 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0- 5.0 sec 364 MBytes 607 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 0.0- 5.0 sec 427 MBytes 711 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0- 5.0 sec 490 MBytes 818 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 0.0- 5.0 sec 545 MBytes 909 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0- 5.0 sec 565 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec
You might use longer intervals to reduce this error (10 secs instead of 5 secs)
$./iperf.bench.sh
.100 102
.200 204
.300 305
.400 410
.500 513
.600 608
.700 713
.800 820
.900 911
1.000 943
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 7:22 HTB accuracy on 10GbE Ryousei Takano
2009-11-02 8:17 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-02 15:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-02 20:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-03 7:43 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-03 9:33 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-03 10:13 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-03 10:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-03 11:13 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-04 3:13 ` Ryousei Takano
2009-11-04 3:45 ` Ryousei Takano
2009-11-04 5:03 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-04 5:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-04 8:19 ` Ryousei Takano
2009-11-04 11:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-04 13:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-04 16:31 ` Ryousei Takano
2009-11-04 17:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 7:08 ` Ryousei Takano
2009-11-05 7:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 10:15 ` Ryousei Takano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF10B1D.4050604@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryousei@gmail.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).