From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:10:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4AF27A48.4090001@gmail.com> References: <4AEEFE2E.7090706@trash.net> <20091102125345.3c39c42e@nehalam> <4AF10B1D.4050604@gmail.com> <4AF110CE.8070701@gmail.com> <4AF1660E.1080401@gmail.com> <4AF1B3CB.1050008@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy , Linux Netdev List , takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp To: Ryousei Takano Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:52377 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750880AbZKEHKE (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:10:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ryousei Takano a =E9crit : > In my experiment, it is not very big problem. I do not send short pa= ckets. > I got the almost same result in the both cases "mtu 64000" and "mtu > 40000 quantum 60000". >=20 > Anyway, setting larger mtu size than the physical mtu does not quiet = make sense. >=20 tc class mtu is a hint given to stack, about average packet size, ie no= t related to physical MTU (because of TSO) You could use same mtu, but disable tso on device