netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] udp: optimize lookup of UDP sockets to by including destination address in the hash key
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:39:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF30DE8.8010102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911051903.02859.opurdila@ixiacom.com>

Octavian Purdila a écrit :
> On Thursday 05 November 2009 18:36:50 you wrote:
>> Octavian Purdila a écrit :
>>> IIRC, we first saw this issue in VoIP tests with up to 16000 sockets
>>> bound on a certain port and IP addresses (each IP address is assigned to
>>> a particular interface). We need this setup in order to emulate lots of
>>> VoIP users each with a different IP address and possible a different L2
>>> encapsulation.
>> Interesting case indeed, is it SIP 5060 port or RTP ports ?
>> (I want to know how many messages per second you want to receive)
>>
>> An rbtree with 16000 elements has 15 levels, its a lot, but OK
>> for small trafic.
>>
> 
> Yep the signaling port not the RTP port, and yes I think there is a fairly  
> small amount of traffic and rbtree might work.
> 
> BTW, there is another side of this problem, the time to bind() those 16K 
> sockets before starting the test - at least on 2.6.7 we didn't yet get to look 
> at this issue on a recent kernel.
> 

Yes, this is O(N^2) algo :

0.3 seconds to bind 8000 UDP sockets on same port (different IPs)
1.5 secs / 12000 sockets
5.3 secs / 16000 sockets 
18  secs / 24000 sockets
36  secs / 32000 sockets


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-05 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-04 21:03 [RFC] [PATCH] udp: optimize lookup of UDP sockets to by including destination address in the hash key Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-04 21:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-04 23:04   ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-04 23:32     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 12:12       ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 13:02         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 14:54           ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 15:07             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 15:16               ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 16:25       ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-05 16:36         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 17:03           ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-05 17:39             ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-06 18:34           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF30DE8.8010102@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgrijincu@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).