From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] udp: optimize lookup of UDP sockets to by including destination address in the hash key
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:39:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF30DE8.8010102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911051903.02859.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Octavian Purdila a écrit :
> On Thursday 05 November 2009 18:36:50 you wrote:
>> Octavian Purdila a écrit :
>>> IIRC, we first saw this issue in VoIP tests with up to 16000 sockets
>>> bound on a certain port and IP addresses (each IP address is assigned to
>>> a particular interface). We need this setup in order to emulate lots of
>>> VoIP users each with a different IP address and possible a different L2
>>> encapsulation.
>> Interesting case indeed, is it SIP 5060 port or RTP ports ?
>> (I want to know how many messages per second you want to receive)
>>
>> An rbtree with 16000 elements has 15 levels, its a lot, but OK
>> for small trafic.
>>
>
> Yep the signaling port not the RTP port, and yes I think there is a fairly
> small amount of traffic and rbtree might work.
>
> BTW, there is another side of this problem, the time to bind() those 16K
> sockets before starting the test - at least on 2.6.7 we didn't yet get to look
> at this issue on a recent kernel.
>
Yes, this is O(N^2) algo :
0.3 seconds to bind 8000 UDP sockets on same port (different IPs)
1.5 secs / 12000 sockets
5.3 secs / 16000 sockets
18 secs / 24000 sockets
36 secs / 32000 sockets
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 21:03 [RFC] [PATCH] udp: optimize lookup of UDP sockets to by including destination address in the hash key Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-04 21:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-04 23:04 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-04 23:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 12:12 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 15:16 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 16:25 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-05 16:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 17:03 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-05 17:39 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-06 18:34 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF30DE8.8010102@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=lgrijincu@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).