netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] move dma_head/dma_maps out of skb_shared_info and into sk_buff
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:14:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF3868B.7070409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF373C9.7040700@intel.com>

Alexander Duyck a écrit :
> During testing we found issues with the use of skb_dma_map/unmap on
> systems that had iommu enabled and were configured to use a bridge.  The
> issue is that if two ports are members of the same bridge, and a
> broadcast packet is sent out on the bridge skb_clone will be used to
> send a copy to all ports, but the clones run into issues because the
> dma mappings for the cloned skbs all share the shared_info structure
> where the dma mappings are stored.
> 
> To resolve that this patch moves those dma mappings out of the
> shared_info structure and into the sk_buff itself.  This allows cloned
> skbs to be mapped separately without causing dma unmapping errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

Hello Alexander

You probably know such a change is a major one ;)

1) a diffstat -p1 -w70 for this kind of patch would be nice.

2) Your patch is garbled (tabulations were replaced by spaces
 by your mailer)

3) Are you sure we need to clear dma_maps[] array and dma_head 
   in __alloc_skb() ? I guess not.
   MAX_SKB_FRAGS = 18 on x86  -> 152 bytes on x86_64.
   Previous implementation was not clearing them.
   Thats would be a major slow down.

4) 152 bytes more in skb -> 304 bytes more in skbuff_fclone_cache
   Do we really want two copies of dma_maps[] when skb are allocated
   from fclone cache ?

5) It seems to me this stuff is needed for xmit only and few drivers,
   could we find a way to not have it for RX path and drivers that dont
   need it ? Maybe drivers themselves should allocate storage for this
  stuff so we can remove it both from shared_info *and* skb 

Thanks



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06  0:54 [RFC] move dma_head/dma_maps out of skb_shared_info and into sk_buff Alexander Duyck
2009-11-06  1:40 ` David Miller
2009-11-06  3:00   ` Alexander Duyck
2009-11-06  9:58     ` David Miller
2009-11-06  2:14 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-06  3:24   ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF3868B.7070409@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).