From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:04:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF402B0.7090202@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF3F905.4030608@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> David
>
> A more elegant patch will be possible for 2.6.33, but for 2.6.32,
> I think following patch is needed (Please note I did not test it)
>
> (More elegant : use RCU lookups ;) , I'll wait for net-next-2.6
> upgrade as well)
>
> Thanks
>
> [PATCH] can: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks
>
> bcm_proc_getifname() is called with RTNL and dev_base_lock
> not held. It calls __dev_get_by_index() without locks, and
> this is illegal (might crash)
>
> Close the race by holding dev_base_lock and copying dev->name
> in the protected section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Thanks for pointing this out.
This is a quite old code section which is not used very often at runtime - and
usually the netdevice is not removed at that time ;-)
Btw. this is no excuse for that missing locking, sorry.
Thanks for the fix!
Compiled and tested successfully.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 10:23 [PATCH] can: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 11:04 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2009-11-08 8:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF402B0.7090202@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).