netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, opurdila@ixiacom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] udp: Optimise multicast reception
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:54:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF454B7.6050103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911061835.24928.lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>

Lucian Adrian Grijincu a écrit :
> În data de Vin 06 Noi 2009 17:59:51 ați scris:
>> +static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
>> +                       struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int final)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int i;
>> +       struct sk_buff *skb1 = NULL;
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> +             if (likely(skb1 == NULL))
>> +                    skb1 = (i == final) ? skb : skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +
>> +               if (skb1 && udp_queue_rcv_skb(stack[i], skb1) <= 0)
>> +                       skb1 = NULL;
>> +       }
>> +       if (skb1)
>> +               consume_skb(skb1);
>> +}
> 
> consume_skb() assumes the skb was successfuly transmitted.
> 
> free_skb() does the same thing, but assumes that the frame is being dropped 
> after a failure and notes that.
> 
> In your code, if (count == 0) you:
> * fail to remove the original skb (memory leak), 
> * simply consume the last dropped skb, without noting the droping failure.
> 
> I fixed these in the attached (untested) patch.
> 
> One last issue: you silently ignore dropped failures (skb1 is reused in case 
> of a failure).
> 
> If this tracing must record all failures, I'd add an
> 	trace_kfree_skb(skb1, __builtin_return_address(0));
> if udp_queue_rcv_skb() fails.
> 
> Other than this, nicely done!
> 

Thanks !

Note, free_skb() doesnt exist ;)
And we should not call consume_skb() in this path.

I made the if (count == 0) done at the end of __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver()



[PATCH net-next-2.6] udp: Optimise multicast reception

UDP multicast rx path is a bit complex and can hold a spinlock
for a long time.

Using a small (32 or 64 entries) stack of socket pointers can help
to perform expensive operations (skb_clone(), udp_queue_rcv_skb())
outside of the lock, in most cases.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com>
---
 net/ipv4/udp.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index d5e75e9..45c73b1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1190,49 +1190,73 @@ drop:
 	return -1;
 }
 
+
+static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
+			struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int final)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	struct sk_buff *skb1 = NULL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		if (likely(skb1 == NULL))
+			skb1 = (i == final) ? skb : skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+		if (skb1 && udp_queue_rcv_skb(stack[i], skb1) <= 0)
+			skb1 = NULL;
+	}
+	if (unlikely(skb1))
+		kfree_skb(skb1);
+}
+
 /*
  *	Multicasts and broadcasts go to each listener.
  *
- *	Note: called only from the BH handler context,
- *	so we don't need to lock the hashes.
+ *	Note: called only from the BH handler context.
  */
 static int __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				    struct udphdr  *uh,
 				    __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
 				    struct udp_table *udptable)
 {
-	struct sock *sk;
+	struct sock *sk, *stack[256 / sizeof(struct sock *)];
 	struct udp_hslot *hslot = udp_hashslot(udptable, net, ntohs(uh->dest));
 	int dif;
+	unsigned int i, count = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&hslot->lock);
 	sk = sk_nulls_head(&hslot->head);
 	dif = skb->dev->ifindex;
 	sk = udp_v4_mcast_next(net, sk, uh->dest, daddr, uh->source, saddr, dif);
-	if (sk) {
-		struct sock *sknext = NULL;
-
-		do {
-			struct sk_buff *skb1 = skb;
-
-			sknext = udp_v4_mcast_next(net, sk_nulls_next(sk), uh->dest,
-						   daddr, uh->source, saddr,
-						   dif);
-			if (sknext)
-				skb1 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
-
-			if (skb1) {
-				int ret = udp_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb1);
-				if (ret > 0)
-					/* we should probably re-process instead
-					 * of dropping packets here. */
-					kfree_skb(skb1);
-			}
-			sk = sknext;
-		} while (sknext);
-	} else
-		consume_skb(skb);
+	while (sk) {
+		stack[count++] = sk;
+		sk = udp_v4_mcast_next(net, sk_nulls_next(sk), uh->dest,
+				       daddr, uh->source, saddr, dif);
+		if (unlikely(count == ARRAY_SIZE(stack))) {
+			if (!sk)
+				break;
+			flush_stack(stack, count, skb, ~0);
+			count = 0;
+		}
+	}
+	/*
+	 * before releasing chain lock, we must take a reference on sockets
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
+		sock_hold(stack[i]);
+
 	spin_unlock(&hslot->lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * do the slow work with no lock held
+	 */
+	if (count) {
+		flush_stack(stack, count, skb, count - 1);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
+			sock_put(stack[i]);
+	} else {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-05 18:33 [PATCH 1/2] udp: cleanup __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-06  8:42 ` David Miller
2009-11-06 14:04   ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-06 15:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 15:59       ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] udp: Optimise multicast reception Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 16:30         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv6: " Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 16:35           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 17:06             ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 take2] " Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 17:19               ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-06 17:24                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 17:54                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 17:59                     ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-06 18:03                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-06 16:35         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2009-11-06 16:54           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF454B7.6050103@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=lgrijincu@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).