From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: TC-HTB issue : low throughput
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:35:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4AF60439.40002@gmail.com>
References: <20091107024305.GA32398@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <4AF60349.8000502@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: jt@hpl.hp.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:45962 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753720AbZKGXfb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:35:31 -0500
Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so2336459bwz.21
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:35:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4AF60349.8000502@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/08/2009 12:31 AM:
> BTW, v2.6.31 should be more exact (but so much...) for above 100mbit
should be:
BTW, v2.6.31 should be more exact (but _not_ so much...) for above 100mbit

Jarek P.