From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 5482
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:07:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4AF6D094.5010700@gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911061041540.30985@sleet.zeugmasystems.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
To: Anirban Sinha <asinha@zeugmasystems.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:42679 "EHLO
	mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751476AbZKHOHO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:07:14 -0500
Received: by yxe17 with SMTP id 17so1970255yxe.33
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:07:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911061041540.30985@sleet.zeugmasystems.local>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Anirban Sinha wrote:
> I am just wondering if the linux TCP/IP stack supports the RFF 5482 (TCP user
> timeout option)?
> 
Not yet, but I'm committed to implementing it.  It was published in March.