From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Allen Simpson Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v5 5/5 RFC] TCPCT part1e: initial SYN exchange with SYNACK data Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:35:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4AFAF5E9.1040906@gmail.com> References: <4AF83E2D.1050401@gmail.com> <4AF84BF3.5020302@gmail.com> <4AF978D3.7030207@gmail.com> <4AF98AAE.6000307@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Joe Perches To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:45111 "EHLO mail-fx0-f221.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758380AbZKKRfj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:35:39 -0500 Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so1267279fxm.21 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:35:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, William Allen Simpson wrote: >> Well, that's what I did with the (now) parts 1b, 1c, and 1d, but som= ebody >> complained that the callers didn't exist yet. >=20 > I guess there's misunderstanding here. Yes, if you bring in new helpe= rs=20 > that solely are used with your feature, then it that feature patch (a= nd=20 > I found DaveM commenting specifically this point I think), or right=20 > beforehand with a clear note that it will be used in the subsequent p= atch.=20 If I understand correctly, in that case I look forward to your Ack for part 1d, a self-contained "helper" feature patch "with a clear note".