From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:47:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4AFC8285.2040804@gmail.com>
References: <81bfc67a0911111448q2e7938fcq18adf2454d6bc8f1@mail.gmail.com>	 <20091112113836.GA7963@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911120546g26627ac5q5860d85f446b29bb@mail.gmail.com> <4AFC5C58.9030207@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:57708 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f221.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754389AbZKLVtc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:49:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4AFC5C58.9030207@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/12/2009 08:04 PM:

> Caleb Cushing wrote, On 11/12/2009 02:46 PM:
...
>>> Btw, you didn't send the stats you compared, and your wireshark dump
>>> doesn't show anything wrong either.

...

>> I didn't see that sorry. I wasn't sure if the dump would or not (I'm
>> not a networking expert, just know more than the average joe).


Hmm... I didn't see that either, sorry! After re-checking I can see
unanswered requests in this dump. Anyway, the main thing to test now is
the first hop to 192.168.1.1 (some info about it?), as I wrote before.

Jarek P.