From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Richter Subject: Documentation: rw_lock lessons learned Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:59:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4AFD1FF1.7080906@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <4AF9C540.5090403@gmail.com> <20091110180646.2e5859a8@nehalam> <4AFAEF78.4080807@gmail.com> <20091111093724.4f40a48d@nehalam> <4AFBEC44.9030409@gmail.com> <4AFC5E3F.7070609@earthlink.net> <20091112150029.1a26c641@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sclark46@earthlink.net, William Allen Simpson , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Developers , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Eric Dumazet To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:51661 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754659AbZKMI7o (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:59:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091112150029.1a26c641@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:13:03 -0500 > Stephen Clark wrote: >> How up to date is this doc? >> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/kernel-locking/index.html >> > > Out of date. > 1. Missing mutex's which have largely replaced semaphores. > > 2. Missing change to lock initialization in later kernels. > > 3. Missing description of lock dependency checker which should be in same guide. 4. The section on atomic reference counting should refer to . -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= =-== -==-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/