From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ang Way Chuang <wcang79@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP throughput drops sharply around MTU of 180 bytes
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:53:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFE6FF0.3030101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51d384e10911140028r76e1aefei3a224b5c542d82e8@mail.gmail.com>
Ang Way Chuang a écrit :
> Hi kernel networking gurus,
>
> I came across a situation where I need to evaluate the packing
> efficiency of
> small packets. Because TCP is byte oriented protocol, there is no way
> to force it
> to generate small packets, so I forced it by adjusting MTU.
>
> However, through the experiment, I found that measured throughput
> of TCP stream dropped significantly if MTU is set to value less than 180 bytes.
> At first, I thought it must be some bugs on my code. So, I decided to repeat
> the test over a dedicated 10Mbps Ethernet link. The results that I measured
> over Ethernet is shown below:
>
>
> MTU Throughput (Mbps)
> ----- --------------
> 181 4.50
> 180 4.39
> 179 3.05
> 178 3.04
>
> I used iperf throughout the tests. Can someone enlighten me on this matter?
> Why the throughput drops sharply if MTU is less than 180 bytes? Is there some
> special meaning associated with 180 that I don't know of?
>
> Some basic information about my system:
> kernel version: 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64
> distro: fedora 10
> CPU: Pentium 4 3.00 GHz
>
> Should you need more information, I shall gladly cooperate. Please keep me
> in the loop because it is hard for me to cop with the volume of emails on netdev
> mailing list.
>
Oh well, this reminds me TCP_MAXSEG doesnt work as expected...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-14 8:28 TCP throughput drops sharply around MTU of 180 bytes Ang Way Chuang
2009-11-14 8:53 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-14 9:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 9:24 ` Ang Way Chuang
2009-11-14 9:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 10:19 ` Eric Dumazet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-14 8:48 Ang Way Chuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFE6FF0.3030101@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wcang79@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).