From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Allen Simpson Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v6 2/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1b: generate Responder Cookie Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:06:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4B01B0AC.2050804@gmail.com> References: <4AFCDA9E.8050003@gmail.com> <4AFCDDC4.1090606@gmail.com> <1258093594.16857.43.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4AFD728F.4030206@gmail.com> <1258135457.16857.107.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B016424.1030403@gmail.com> <4B01710F.70800@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Joe Perches , Linux Kernel Network Developers , "Paul E. McKenney" To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f202.google.com ([209.85.211.202]:34892 "EHLO mail-yw0-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753297AbZKPUGB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:06:01 -0500 Received: by ywh40 with SMTP id 40so3442668ywh.33 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:06:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B01710F.70800@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Dumazet wrote: > William Allen Simpson a =C3=A9crit : >> Do I hear an Ack? >> > Fine by me William >=20 > But you forgot to re-include full commit message and Signed-off-by: >=20 > Yes it seems cumbersome, but David is handling ~50 patches per day,=20 > we shall give him as _perfect_ patches as possible. >=20 Agreed, I understood that I'd need to send out the _entire_ patch serie= s without the RFC designation before our leader would consider it. Right now, I'm just collecting as many comments, improvements, and Acks= as possible before fetch, rebase, compiling, testing, and re-posting the whole megillah again with "no fuzz" patches. Hopefully, splitting this into more sub-parts (as you requested) enable= s reviewing, but of course it's an exponential increase in preparation an= d test time. So, I'm trying to get some comments on every sub-part.