Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> But really, this is somewhat orthogonal to the original problem, so let
>> me see if we can bring it back on topic.  Michael stated that this patch
>> in question may be problematic because there are places in the stack
>> that can get_page() without also maintaining a reference to the shinfo
>> object.  Evgeniy seems to say the opposite.  I am not sure who is right,
>> or if I misunderstood one or both of them.  Any thoughts?
> 
> There are loads of places where this can happen.  Start with
> pskb_expand_head.

Indeed, I see your point.  Looks like we can potentially solve that with
an extra level of indirection.  E.g. skb->shinfo->owner, with a
ref-count+callback.  Thoughts?

Kind Regards,
-Greg