From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/addr: Use appropriate locking with for_each_netdev() Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:51:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4B063C78.1070502@gmail.com> References: <4AF8EBA4.2070102@gmail.com> <8C10E584257A46DB9A0AD193520CF4A7@amr.corp.intel.com> <4B0628E0.6000404@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Sean Hefty , "David S. Miller" , Linux Netdev List , Roland Dreier , Hal Rosenstock , linux-rdma To: Roland Dreier Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Roland Dreier a =E9crit : > > Any news of this patch ? > >=20 > > We need it for 2.6.32 and also to prepare 2.6.33 with upcoming pat= ches. >=20 > Sorry for not explicitly emailing about this patch. I applied it as > part of Sean's series, but I just added it to my 2.6.33 queue. At th= is > point in the release cycle it doesn't look severe enough for 2.6.32, > unless I miss something. Its possible to get infinite loops or crashes. I am not a RDMA user, so I personally dont care :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html