From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Xmit Packet Steering (XPS) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4B07188C.2070808@gmail.com> References: <4B05D8DC.7020907@gmail.com> <87aayg539l.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "David S. Miller" , Tom Herbert , Linux Netdev List To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:35878 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754436AbZKTWaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:30:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87aayg539l.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andi Kleen a =E9crit : >=20 > Do you have numbers on this? It seems like a lot of effort to avoid t= ransfering > a few cache lines. Lot of efforts ? hmm... >=20 > -Andi (who is a bit sceptical and would rather see generic work for t= his in slab) >=20 Yes, I know, but slab/slub is already quite optimized :) Coding XPS was more a way to try to help push RPS in, I did not benchma= rked it BTW. My new dev machine is up, with two E5530 cpus and a 82599EB 10-Gigabit = dual port card : Pretty amazing :=3D)