From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/11]Optimize the upload speed for PPP connection. Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:21:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4B07DB40.4020909@gmail.com> References: <20091117.012248.86306050.davem@davemloft.net> <4B0278D9.6030806@gmail.com> <20091117.034959.159359822.davem@davemloft.net> <20091121092933.GB1932@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , william.allen.simpson@gmail.com, huananhu@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091121092933.GB1932@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote, On 11/21/2009 10:29 AM: > On Tue 2009-11-17 03:49:59, David Miller wrote: >> From: William Allen Simpson >> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:20:09 -0500 >> >>> What David may have meant, had he followed >>> Documentation/ManagementStyle or had any project management skills >>> what-so-ever, is that you need to follow >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches more carefully. >> Are personal attacks on me really necessary? >> >> Do you want me to look closely at your patches with a high priority >> when you submit them for inclusion? If so, then you may want to >> think twice about saying things like this. > > Was this kind of threats really neccessary? What kind of threats do you recommend? (And why at all do you call a threat doing something William misses, and David asked for confirmation?) Jarek P.