From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ben@bigfootnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bridge + Conntrack + SKB Recycle: Fragment Reassembly Errors
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:21:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0883FD.2090806@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091121.110832.213888237.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:50:38 +0100
>
>> This code in ip_fragment() looks suspicious:
>>
>> if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
>> ...
>> skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
>> ...
>> if (skb->sk) {
>> frag->sk = skb->sk;
>> frag->destructor = sock_wfree;
>> truesizes += frag->truesize;
>> }
>>
>> truesizes is later used to adjust truesize of the head skb.
>> For some reason this is only done when it originated from a
>> local socket.
>
> Well, it shouldn't look _that_ suspicious.
>
> What this code is doing is making sure that after we make all of these
> changes, the truesize of the SKBs referrng to the socket do not
> change.
>
> It's simply making sure that the math works out when all the
> sock_wfree() calls occur later.
>
> If we don't have a socket involved, there is no reason to make
> these adjustments.
That seems to be the assumption. But ip_defrag() uses skb->truesize
as well to make sure the defragmentation memory limits are not exceeded.
In this case what seems to be happening is:
- gianfar with skb recycling enabled receives a number of fragments
on a bridge (~64000b total)
- conntrack defragments the packet using ip_defrag(), which causes
skb->truesize of the head fragment to account for all the fragments
- the packet is refragmented in the bridging code using ip_fragment().
This doesn't re-adjust skb->truesize of the head fragment when the
packet is not associated with a socket
- the head is recycled in gianfar
- another fragment is received and reuses the recycled skb with a
huge truesize
- the defragmentation limits are exceeded due to the huge truesize
So it seems we need to adjust skb->truesize in ip_fragment() since
skb_recycle_check() assumes the skb is linear (and therefore
skb->truesize reflects the linear size). Ben's suggestions of adding
an upper limit based on the requested size to skb_recycle_check()
makes sense to me as well to avoid this problem when recycling large
linear skbs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-22 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 16:09 Bridge + Conntrack + SKB Recycle: Fragment Reassembly Errors ben
2009-11-10 16:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-21 19:08 ` David Miller
2009-11-22 0:21 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-11-22 0:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-12-01 16:00 ` ben
2009-12-01 16:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-12-01 23:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0883FD.2090806@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=ben@bigfootnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).