From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:03:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4B0A9631.2030705@gmail.com> References: <1258970332.29747.262.camel@jdb-workstation> <4B0A63FA.5000804@gmail.com> <1258979320.29747.270.camel@jdb-workstation> <4B0A8D41.6010608@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Linux Kernel Network Hackers , Robert Olsson To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:36739 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752383AbZKWOD1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:03:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > grep LowTotal /proc/meminfo > LowTotal: 747080 kB > > What does that mean? Is it bad? What should I run on a 32-bit > system/kernel? If you have more than 1GB of physical ram, and use your machine as a router, you might compile a 2GB/2GB User/Kernel kernel, to get twice available RAM for kernel and more IP route entries (if needed) make menuconfig --> Processor type and features --> Memory split --> 2G/2G > Can you recommend any other /proc/sys/ tuning options? Really hard to say without exact context of use :) > > Does my kernel boot option rhash_entries=262143 make sense anymore? > Or do we adjust the hash bucket size dynamically these days? > Its not dynamic yet.