netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ixgbe question
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:38:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911231500060.24347@ask.diku.dk>

Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :

> How is your smp_affinity mask's set?
> 
> grep . /proc/irq/*/fiber1-*/../smp_affinity

First, I tried default affinities (ffff)

Then I tried irqbalance... no more success.

Driver seems to try to handle all queues on one cpu on low trafic,
and possibly dynamically switches to a multi-cpu mode,
but as all interrupts are masked, we stay in 
a NAPI context handling all queues.

And we let one cpu in flood/drops mode.




> 
> 
>> But only one CPU (CPU1) had a softirq running, 100%, and many frames
>> were dropped
> 
> Just a hint, I use 'ethtool -S fiber1' to see how the packets gets
> distributed across the rx and tx queues.

They are correctly distributed

     rx_queue_0_packets: 14119644
     rx_queue_0_bytes: 847178640
     rx_queue_1_packets: 14126315
     rx_queue_1_bytes: 847578900
     rx_queue_2_packets: 14115249
     rx_queue_2_bytes: 846914940
     rx_queue_3_packets: 14118146
     rx_queue_3_bytes: 847088760
     rx_queue_4_packets: 14130869
     rx_queue_4_bytes: 847853268
     rx_queue_5_packets: 14112239
     rx_queue_5_bytes: 846734340
     rx_queue_6_packets: 14128425
     rx_queue_6_bytes: 847705500
     rx_queue_7_packets: 14110587
     rx_queue_7_bytes: 846635220
     rx_queue_8_packets: 14117350
     rx_queue_8_bytes: 847041000
     rx_queue_9_packets: 14125992
     rx_queue_9_bytes: 847559520
     rx_queue_10_packets: 14121732
     rx_queue_10_bytes: 847303920
     rx_queue_11_packets: 14120997
     rx_queue_11_bytes: 847259820
     rx_queue_12_packets: 14125576
     rx_queue_12_bytes: 847535854
     rx_queue_13_packets: 14118512
     rx_queue_13_bytes: 847110720
     rx_queue_14_packets: 14118348
     rx_queue_14_bytes: 847100880
     rx_queue_15_packets: 14118647
     rx_queue_15_bytes: 847118820



> 
> 
> 
>> CLONE_SKB="clone_skb 15"
> 
> Be careful with to high clone, as my experience is it will send a burst
> of clone_skb packets before the packet gets randomized again.

Yes, but 15 should be ok with 10Gb link  :)

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-23  6:46 [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23  7:32 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-23  9:36   ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23 10:21     ` ixgbe question Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 10:30       ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 10:34       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 10:37         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 14:05           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 21:26           ` David Miller
2009-11-23 14:10       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:38         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-23 18:30           ` robert
2009-11-23 16:59             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 20:54               ` robert
2009-11-23 21:28                 ` David Miller
2009-11-23 22:14                   ` Robert Olsson
2009-11-23 23:28               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 23:44                 ` David Miller
2009-11-24  7:46                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24  8:46                   ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-24  9:07                   ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24  9:55                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 10:06                       ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 11:37                         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ixgbe: Fix TX stats accounting Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 13:23                           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25  7:38                             ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-25  9:31                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25  9:38                                 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-24 13:14                         ` ixgbe question John Fastabend
2009-11-29  8:18                           ` David Miller
2009-11-30 13:02                             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-30 20:20                               ` John Fastabend
2009-11-26 14:10                       ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 17:05     ` [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 23:32       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-24  8:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24  8:59           ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24  9:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24  9:15               ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 14:43               ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24  9:15             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 10:07             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-24 17:55               ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-25 11:18               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24  6:07       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24  8:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 14:42           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 17:39           ` David Miller
2009-11-24 17:56             ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:26               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 18:33                 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 19:01                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 19:53                     ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:54                 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 18:58                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 20:35                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-24 20:46                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:30                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:37                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-25 11:35                             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 11:50                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-26 11:43                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24  5:17     ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-24  8:39       ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-10 21:27 Ixgbe question Ben Greear
2008-03-11  1:01 ` Brandeburg, Jesse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@diku.dk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).