From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ixgbe question
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:38:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911231500060.24347@ask.diku.dk>
Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
> How is your smp_affinity mask's set?
>
> grep . /proc/irq/*/fiber1-*/../smp_affinity
First, I tried default affinities (ffff)
Then I tried irqbalance... no more success.
Driver seems to try to handle all queues on one cpu on low trafic,
and possibly dynamically switches to a multi-cpu mode,
but as all interrupts are masked, we stay in
a NAPI context handling all queues.
And we let one cpu in flood/drops mode.
>
>
>> But only one CPU (CPU1) had a softirq running, 100%, and many frames
>> were dropped
>
> Just a hint, I use 'ethtool -S fiber1' to see how the packets gets
> distributed across the rx and tx queues.
They are correctly distributed
rx_queue_0_packets: 14119644
rx_queue_0_bytes: 847178640
rx_queue_1_packets: 14126315
rx_queue_1_bytes: 847578900
rx_queue_2_packets: 14115249
rx_queue_2_bytes: 846914940
rx_queue_3_packets: 14118146
rx_queue_3_bytes: 847088760
rx_queue_4_packets: 14130869
rx_queue_4_bytes: 847853268
rx_queue_5_packets: 14112239
rx_queue_5_bytes: 846734340
rx_queue_6_packets: 14128425
rx_queue_6_bytes: 847705500
rx_queue_7_packets: 14110587
rx_queue_7_bytes: 846635220
rx_queue_8_packets: 14117350
rx_queue_8_bytes: 847041000
rx_queue_9_packets: 14125992
rx_queue_9_bytes: 847559520
rx_queue_10_packets: 14121732
rx_queue_10_bytes: 847303920
rx_queue_11_packets: 14120997
rx_queue_11_bytes: 847259820
rx_queue_12_packets: 14125576
rx_queue_12_bytes: 847535854
rx_queue_13_packets: 14118512
rx_queue_13_bytes: 847110720
rx_queue_14_packets: 14118348
rx_queue_14_bytes: 847100880
rx_queue_15_packets: 14118647
rx_queue_15_bytes: 847118820
>
>
>
>> CLONE_SKB="clone_skb 15"
>
> Be careful with to high clone, as my experience is it will send a burst
> of clone_skb packets before the packet gets randomized again.
Yes, but 15 should be ok with 10Gb link :)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 6:46 [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23 7:32 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-23 9:36 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23 10:21 ` ixgbe question Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 10:30 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 10:34 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 10:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 14:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 21:26 ` David Miller
2009-11-23 14:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-23 18:30 ` robert
2009-11-23 16:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 20:54 ` robert
2009-11-23 21:28 ` David Miller
2009-11-23 22:14 ` Robert Olsson
2009-11-23 23:28 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 23:44 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 7:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 8:46 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-24 9:07 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 9:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 10:06 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ixgbe: Fix TX stats accounting Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 7:38 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-25 9:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 9:38 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-24 13:14 ` ixgbe question John Fastabend
2009-11-29 8:18 ` David Miller
2009-11-30 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-30 20:20 ` John Fastabend
2009-11-26 14:10 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 17:05 ` [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 23:32 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-24 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 8:59 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 9:15 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 14:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 10:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-24 17:55 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-25 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 6:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 14:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 17:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 17:56 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 18:33 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 19:53 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:54 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 18:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 20:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-24 20:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:37 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-25 11:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 11:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-26 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 5:17 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-24 8:39 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-10 21:27 Ixgbe question Ben Greear
2008-03-11 1:01 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).