From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] net: fix an array index overflow
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:48:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B14D878.1070802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091201082901.4678.16688.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
Amerigo Wang a écrit :
> Don't use the address of an out-of-boundary element.
>
> Maybe this is not harmful at runtime, but it is still
> good to improve it.
Why ?
for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {}
is valid, even if 'end' is 'outside of bounds'
It also works if start == end.
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index 57737b8..2669361 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ static int __init inet_init(void)
> #endif
>
> /* Register the socket-side information for inet_create. */
> - for (r = &inetsw[0]; r < &inetsw[SOCK_MAX]; ++r)
> + for (r = &inetsw[0]; r <= &inetsw[SOCK_MAX-1]; ++r)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(r);
>
> for (q = inetsw_array; q < &inetsw_array[INETSW_ARRAY_LEN]; ++q)
> --
I wonder why you want to 'fix' this loop and let following loop unchanged...
for (q = inetsw_array; q < &inetsw_array[INETSW_ARRAY_LEN]; ++q)
inet_register_protosw(q);
If this really hurts your eyes, why not using basic loops ?
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 7d12c6a..476cda7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -1540,8 +1540,7 @@ static struct packet_type ip_packet_type __read_mostly = {
static int __init inet_init(void)
{
struct sk_buff *dummy_skb;
- struct inet_protosw *q;
- struct list_head *r;
+ int i;
int rc = -EINVAL;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm) > sizeof(dummy_skb->cb));
@@ -1584,11 +1583,11 @@ static int __init inet_init(void)
#endif
/* Register the socket-side information for inet_create. */
- for (r = &inetsw[0]; r < &inetsw[SOCK_MAX]; ++r)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(r);
+ for (i = 0; i < SOCK_MAX; i++)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inetsw[i]);
- for (q = inetsw_array; q < &inetsw_array[INETSW_ARRAY_LEN]; ++q)
- inet_register_protosw(q);
+ for (i = 0; i < INETSW_ARRAY_LEN; i++)
+ inet_register_protosw(&inetsw_array[i]);
/*
* Set the ARP module up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 8:26 [Patch] net: fix an array index overflow Amerigo Wang
2009-12-01 8:48 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-12-01 8:56 ` Cong Wang
2009-12-02 13:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2009-12-03 8:30 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B14D878.1070802@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).