* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 [not found] <bug-14685-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/> @ 2009-11-25 20:47 ` Andrew Morton 2009-11-30 11:33 ` Michael Chan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-11-25 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Chan, netdev; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, olel (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:16:00 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14685 > > Summary: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in > bnx2 > Product: Drivers > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.31.6 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Network > AssignedTo: drivers_network@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: olel@ans.pl > Regression: Yes > > > After upgradig my kernel from 2.6.30 to 2.6.31 I'm observing very high number > of dropped packets on BCM5708(Dell PowerEdge 1950)/BCM5716(Dell PowerEdge R410) > NICs. > > # uptime ; ifconfig eth0|grep "RX p"; ethtool -S eth0|grep disc > 01:07:31 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.07, 0.04 > RX packets:2234 errors:0 dropped:527 overruns:0 frame:0 > rx_discards: 0 > rx_fw_discards: 527 > > Everything seems to work just fine so I suspect that the driver/firmware is > counting something wrong. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 2009-11-25 20:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 Andrew Morton @ 2009-11-30 11:33 ` Michael Chan 2009-11-30 15:33 ` Krzysztof Oledzki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael Chan @ 2009-11-30 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Andrew Morton', netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, olel@ans.pl Andrew Morton wrote: > > # uptime ; ifconfig eth0|grep "RX p"; ethtool -S eth0|grep disc > > 01:07:31 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.07, 0.04 > > RX packets:2234 errors:0 dropped:527 overruns:0 frame:0 > > rx_discards: 0 > > rx_fw_discards: 527 > > Please report rx_bcast_packets and rx_mcast_packets together with rx_fw_discards. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 2009-11-30 11:33 ` Michael Chan @ 2009-11-30 15:33 ` Krzysztof Oledzki 2009-11-30 17:44 ` Michael Chan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Oledzki @ 2009-11-30 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Chan Cc: 'Andrew Morton', netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 631 bytes --] On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Michael Chan wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> # uptime ; ifconfig eth0|grep "RX p"; ethtool -S eth0|grep disc >>> 01:07:31 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.07, 0.04 >>> RX packets:2234 errors:0 dropped:527 overruns:0 frame:0 >>> rx_discards: 0 >>> rx_fw_discards: 527 >>> > > Please report rx_bcast_packets and rx_mcast_packets together with > rx_fw_discards. Thanks. # ethtool -S eth0|egrep "(rx_bcast_packets|rx_mcast_packets|rx_fw_discards)" rx_mcast_packets: 2806 rx_bcast_packets: 790016 rx_fw_discards: 790016 Best regards, Krzysztof Olędzki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 2009-11-30 15:33 ` Krzysztof Oledzki @ 2009-11-30 17:44 ` Michael Chan 2009-12-02 13:37 ` Krzysztof Olędzki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael Chan @ 2009-11-30 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Oledzki Cc: 'Andrew Morton', netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 07:33 -0800, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > # ethtool -S eth0|egrep "(rx_bcast_packets|rx_mcast_packets| > rx_fw_discards)" > rx_mcast_packets: 2806 > rx_bcast_packets: 790016 > rx_fw_discards: 790016 This tells me that all the dropped packets are occurring in the iSCSI ring. We have recently enabled iSCSI in the kernel and you probably don't have the userspace components to handle the iSCSI ring. All broadcast packets are also received in the iSCSI ring and they are all dropped in this case without the userspace components. Networking is not affected. If you rmmod the bnx2i and cnic drivers, the drop counter should stop counting. We have newer firmware that will not include dropped iSCSI packets in the networking counters. It should appear in the 2.6.33 kernel time-frame. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 2009-11-30 17:44 ` Michael Chan @ 2009-12-02 13:37 ` Krzysztof Olędzki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Olędzki @ 2009-12-02 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Chan Cc: 'Andrew Morton', netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org On 2009-11-30 18:44, Michael Chan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 07:33 -0800, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >> # ethtool -S eth0|egrep "(rx_bcast_packets|rx_mcast_packets| >> rx_fw_discards)" >> rx_mcast_packets: 2806 >> rx_bcast_packets: 790016 >> rx_fw_discards: 790016 > > This tells me that all the dropped packets are occurring in the iSCSI > ring. > > We have recently enabled iSCSI in the kernel and you probably don't have > the userspace components to handle the iSCSI ring. All broadcast > packets are also received in the iSCSI ring and they are all dropped in > this case without the userspace components. Networking is not affected. > If you rmmod the bnx2i and cnic drivers, the drop counter should stop > counting. > > We have newer firmware that will not include dropped iSCSI packets in > the networking counters. It should appear in the 2.6.33 kernel > time-frame. Yep, it was the cnic driver. Now I feel silly. Thank you for you help and sorry for the noise. I going to close it with RESOLVED-DOCUMENTED. Best regards, Krzysztof Olędzki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-02 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-14685-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-11-25 20:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14685] New: 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31: very high number of RX dropped in bnx2 Andrew Morton
2009-11-30 11:33 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-30 15:33 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-11-30 17:44 ` Michael Chan
2009-12-02 13:37 ` Krzysztof Olędzki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).