From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Allen Simpson Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the net tree Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:16:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4B18FDA3.5060601@gmail.com> References: <20091204194301.ca77fe40.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091204194301.ca77fe40.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in > net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c between commit > 519855c508b9a17878c0977a3cdefc09b59b30df ("TCPCT part 1c: > sysctl_tcp_cookie_size, socket option TCP_COOKIE_TRANSACTIONS") from the > net tree and commit f8572d8f2a2ba75408b97dc24ef47c83671795d7 ("sysctl > net: Remove unused binary sysctl code") from the sysctl tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Hi, I'm not Eric, but it's my TCPCT patch -- is there something more that I need to do? Adding a sysctl was my very first query to Linux lists. I thought everything was covered in that and subsequent threads. Subject: query: adding a sysctl Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:05 -0400