netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: export the number of times the recv queue was full
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:38:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B216A61.7020704@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091210210920.6820.12664.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>

Eric Paris wrote:
> We got a request in which a customer was trying to determine how often their
> recieve queue was full and thus they were sending a zero window back to the
> other side.  By the time they would notice the slowdowns they would have all
> empty receive queues and wouldn't know which socket was a problem. 

Wouldn't a tcpdump command with suitable filter expression on the window field 
of the TCP header do?

> It also
> allows them to find the sockets in which they need to up the recv queue size
> rather than doing it for all sockets across the box. 

Doesn't Linux by default "autotune" the socket buffers? (Or perhaps is that how 
they got zero windows from time to time anyway?)

Or does this customer's application(s) bypass that by making explicit 
setsockopt() calls, and presumably have a way to tell the application(s) on a 
destination by destination basis which connections to increase?

More generically, zero window means the application isn't calling read/recv fast 
enough right?  Or is it "known" that the traffic the applcation is receiving is 
bursty and this isn't a sustained overload situation?

rick jones

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-10 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-10 21:09 [PATCH] net: export the number of times the recv queue was full Eric Paris
2009-12-10 21:38 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2009-12-10 21:48   ` David Miller
2009-12-10 21:52   ` Eric Paris
2009-12-10 22:02     ` David Miller
2009-12-10 22:13     ` Rick Jones
2009-12-10 21:49 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B216A61.7020704@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).