From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:20:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B415E73.1050801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807377b1001031906s6b1ee576jc021da2642bb4147@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/03/2010 07:06 PM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> have a system with lots of igb and ixgbe, when iov/vf are enabled for
>> them, we hit the limit of 3064.
>>
>> when system have 20 pcie installed, and one card have 2 functions, and one
>> function need 64 msi-x,
>> may need 20 * 2 * 64 = 2560 for msi-x
>> but if iov and vf are enabled
>> may need 20 * 2 * 64 * 3 = 7680 for msi-x
>> assume system with 5 ioapic, nr_irqs_gsi will be 120.
>> NR_CPUS = 512, and nr_cpu_ids = 128
>> will have NR_IRQS = 256 + 512 * 64 = 33024
>> will have nr_irqs = 120 + 8 * 128 + 120 * 64 = 8824
>>
>> when SPARSE_IRQ is not set, there is no increase with data
>> when NR_CPUS=128, and SPARSE_IRQ is set
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21837444 4216564 12480736 38534744 24bfe58 vmlinux.before
>> 21837442 4216580 12480736 38534758 24bfe66 vmlinux.after
>> when NR_CPUS=4096, and SPARSE_IRQ is set
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21878619 5610244 13415392 40904255 270263f vmlinux.before
>> 21878617 5610244 13415392 40904253 270263d vmlinux.after
>>
>> -v2: update comments to address Ingo's concern
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> I'm not sure this is the best plan, but may be okay for now. What
> happens when all of your slots have 6 port 82599 ixgbe adapters in
> them? They are being made[1], as well as quad port 82576 igb
> adapters, however I'm not fully sure of the SRIOV support of the
> bridges being used on those adapters.
>
> Is it on the table to (re-)design this subsystem to be a little more
> dynamic? There are probably examples in ppc64 or ia64 directories.
> Every time you suggest a limit I can find a case where it won't be
> enough.
>
> [1] http://www.hotlavasystems.com/products_10gbe.html
you mean
20 * 6 * 64 * 3 ?
23040
maybe we can just keep nr_irqs = (256 - 32 - 10) * nr_cpu_ids?
32: for exception
10: for IPI etc.
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-04 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4B347AEE.6030705@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20091228094707.GH24690@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4B398ECD.1080506@kernel.org>
2010-01-04 3:06 ` [PATCH -v2] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs Jesse Brandeburg
2010-01-04 3:20 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-04 6:56 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-04 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 0:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-05 0:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 20:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 21:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 22:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: get more exact nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B415E73.1050801@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).