From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:35:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B424305.7050803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1my0thelq.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On 01/04/2010 11:09 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
>
>> On 01/04/2010 08:18 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
>>>
>>> This patch is wrong.
>>>
>>>> between FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR (0x20) and FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR (0x41)
>>>>
>>>> for 0x20 and 0x2f, we are safe be used_vectors will prevent it to use used one.
>>>
>>> We can not use any of 0x20 - 0x2f for ioapic irqs. We need the entire
>>> priority level to ensure that the irq move cleanup ipi is of a lower
>>> priority.
>>>
>>
>> Almost makes one want to abuse 0x1f for that. Although 0x00..0x1f are
>> reserved for exceptions, the APICs range down to 0x10, and well, when
>> 0x1f ends up actually getting used as an exception vector that we
>> support, then we can trivially change that. In the meantime it would
>> actually make use of an otherwise-unusable APIC priority level.
>
> An optimization like that (with a big fat comment) seems reasonable
> to me.
so we can use [0x10, 0x1f]
sth like this?
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 16 vectors
-v2: according to hpa that we could start from 0x10
according to Eric, we should hold 16 vectors for IRQ MOVE
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c | 11 +++++++++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,8 @@ __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_
* Also, we've got to be careful not to trash gate
* 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
*/
- static int current_vector = FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR, current_offset = 0;
+ static int current_vector = 0;
+ static int current_offset = 0;
unsigned int old_vector;
int cpu, err;
cpumask_var_t tmp_mask;
@@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ next:
if (vector >= first_system_vector) {
/* If out of vectors on large boxen, must share them. */
offset = (offset + 1) % 8;
- vector = FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR + offset;
+ vector = 0 + offset;
}
if (unlikely(current_vector == vector))
continue;
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
/*
* IDT vectors usable for external interrupt sources start
* at 0x20:
+ * hpa said we can start from 0x10
*/
-#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR 0x20
+#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR 0x10
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
# define SYSCALL_VECTOR 0x80
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static void __init smp_intr_init(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
+ int i;
+
/*
* The reschedule interrupt is a CPU-to-CPU reschedule-helper
* IPI, driven by wakeup.
@@ -174,7 +176,9 @@ static void __init smp_intr_init(void)
/* Low priority IPI to cleanup after moving an irq */
set_intr_gate(IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR, irq_move_cleanup_interrupt);
- set_bit(IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR, used_vectors);
+ /* Eric said: Need to hold entire priority */
+ for (i = IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR; i < IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR+0x10; i++)
+ set_bit(i, used_vectors);
/* IPI used for rebooting/stopping */
alloc_intr_gate(REBOOT_VECTOR, reboot_interrupt);
@@ -222,6 +226,9 @@ void __init native_init_IRQ(void)
/* Execute any quirks before the call gates are initialised: */
x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init();
+ for (i = 0; i < 0x10; i++)
+ set_bit(i, used_vectors);
+
apic_intr_init();
/*
@@ -229,7 +236,7 @@ void __init native_init_IRQ(void)
* us. (some of these will be overridden and become
* 'special' SMP interrupts)
*/
- for (i = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; i < NR_VECTORS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VECTORS; i++) {
/* IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR could be used in trap_init already. */
if (!test_bit(i, used_vectors))
set_intr_gate(i, interrupt[i-FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR]);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-04 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4B347AEE.6030705@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20091228094707.GH24690@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4B398ECD.1080506@kernel.org>
2010-01-04 3:06 ` [PATCH -v2] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs Jesse Brandeburg
2010-01-04 3:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 6:56 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-04 19:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-04 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 0:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-05 0:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 20:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 21:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 22:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: get more exact nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B424305.7050803@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).