From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rps: some comments
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B46D053.3000604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65634d661001071607k63c33a0q4f402942d64ea77e@mail.gmail.com>
Le 08/01/2010 01:07, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> I kind of like the way it is right now, which is to enqueue even on
> the local CPU. The advantage of that is that all the packets received
> in the napi run are dispatched to all the participating CPUs before
> any are processed, this is good for average and worst case latency on
> a packet burst.
I see... this makes sense, thanks.
Do you know if some non multi queue NIC would be able to provide us
a suitable hash to fill skb->rxhash in NIC driver itself ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-08 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-20 23:28 [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:50 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 0:05 ` David Miller
2009-11-21 0:12 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 0:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-20 23:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-20 23:53 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:56 ` David Miller
2009-12-17 21:04 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 1:32 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 5:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 7:56 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 18:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:10 ` [BUG net-next-2.6] Had to revert bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-01-06 21:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:38 ` David Miller
2010-01-06 21:45 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 22:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] fix " Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 23:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-01-07 8:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07 8:41 ` David Miller
2010-01-06 22:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-07 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07 17:42 ` rps: some comments Eric Dumazet
2010-01-08 0:07 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-08 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-01-11 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-11 9:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-14 4:40 ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-21 0:04 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-21 9:03 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 9:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B46D053.3000604@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).