From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: at91_ether.c - Allow transmitter interrupt to be handled first in ISR Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:38:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4B4FFF51.6020803@gmail.com> References: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD36740289748A@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> <20100113.173253.223656114.davem@davemloft.net> <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD367402897539@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: James Kosin Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:38714 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751048Ab0AOFiu (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:38:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3DBBD805E3BA064A87F551C0E8BD367402897539@MAILSRV.intcomgrp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 14/01/2010 21:28, James Kosin a =E9crit : > Thanks David, >=20 > I'm checking out the latest git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel= /git/davem/net-2.6.git > With git now... >=20 > A few items: > a) Is it OK to use git-diff to build a patch file? Or does everyon= e still prefer > diff? If you cook your patches using a git tree, git diff is very fine to sen= d official patches. >=20 > b) I'm going to try and test also; since, I do have an active platf= orm I > can test on. Are there any other developers using the ARM that = may be able > to provide some feedback? Eric Dumazet had some interesting com= ments > but, none of the original people in the file are around anymore = I'm afraid. > That or they really don't want to be contacted. If you can test patches, and other dev can review them, they can find t= heir way in kernel, dont worry :)