From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:41:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B55EEC6.4070402@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFA56A461E.61811628-ON652576AD.0022D2A5-652576AD.002350AE@in.ibm.com>
Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote on 01/15/2010 11:43:06 PM:
>>Multiple process tests may not be as easy in netperf as it is in
>>iperf, but under:
>>
>>ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/misc
>>
>> I have a single-stream test script I use called runemomni.sh and an
>> example of its output, as well as an aggregate script I use called
>> runemomniagg2.sh - I'll post an example of its output there as
>> soon as I finish some runs.
>
>
> I usually run netperf for smaller number of threads and aggregate
> the output using some scripts. I will try what you suggested above,
> and see if I can get consistent results for higher number of
> processes. Thanks for the links.
You're welcome - the output of the aggregate script is up there too now
- generally I run three systems for the aggregate tests and then include
the TCP_MAERTs stuff, but in this case since I had only two otherwise
identical systems, TCP_MAERTs would have been redundant.
rick jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-19 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 5:33 [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices? Krishna Kumar
2010-01-15 8:36 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 8:50 ` Simon Kagstrom
2010-01-15 8:52 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 9:00 ` Simon Kagstrom
2010-01-15 9:04 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 9:03 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OF1B0853DD.2824263E-ON652576AC.002FA9D4-652576AC.0030AC47@LocalDomain>
2010-01-15 9:20 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-15 9:18 ` David Miller
2010-01-20 12:19 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-21 9:25 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-27 7:12 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 9:06 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-29 11:15 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 11:33 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-29 11:50 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 20:02 ` Rick Jones
2010-01-29 19:56 ` Rick Jones
[not found] ` <OF7EA723DA.DC2FF4FC-ON652576B8.002064CB-652576B8.00267739@LocalDomain>
2010-01-27 9:42 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 9:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-15 18:13 ` Rick Jones
2010-01-16 6:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-19 17:41 ` Rick Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B55EEC6.4070402@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).