From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: IPsec rules are ineffective with ipv6
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B61B047.10908@dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B61AC22.2050907@hp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]
What about this one?
Only compilation tested.
xfrm_lookup() is missing in IPv6 output path. Call it when dst is build. Initial
patch was written by Junwei Zhang <junwei.zhang@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Le 28.01.2010 16:24, Vlad Yasevich a écrit :
>
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com>
>> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:12:59 +0100
>>
>>> xfrm_lookup() is missing in sctp_v6_xmit(), add it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <junwei.zhang@6wind.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
>> Doing this every transmit packet is overkill.
>>
>> Whatever calculates the route that ends up in skb_dst(skb)
>> should be making this xfrm_lookup() call, not here.
>>
>
>
> Hmm.. Interesting. Looks like ip_route_output_key() will
> do xfrm_lookup for you, but there is no ipv6 route lookup call
> that will do the same thing.
>
> I guess we'll need to add an xfrm_lookup call in sctp_v6_get_dst().
>
> -vlad
[-- Attachment #2: x2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 810 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index cc50fbe..4081ffb 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -258,13 +258,14 @@ static struct dst_entry *sctp_v6_get_dst(struct sctp_association *asoc,
}
dst = ip6_route_output(&init_net, NULL, &fl);
- if (!dst->error) {
- struct rt6_info *rt;
- rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
- SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
- &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &rt->rt6i_src.addr);
- return dst;
- }
+ if (!dst->error)
+ if (xfrm_lookup(&init_net, &dst, &fl, asoc ? asoc->base.sk : NULL, 0) >= 0) {
+ struct rt6_info *rt;
+ rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
+ SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
+ &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &rt->rt6i_src.addr);
+ return dst;
+ }
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("NO ROUTE\n");
dst_release(dst);
return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-27 14:12 [PATCH] sctp: IPsec rules are ineffective with ipv6 Nicolas Dichtel
2010-01-28 13:51 ` David Miller
2010-01-28 15:24 ` Vlad Yasevich
2010-01-28 15:41 ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2010-01-28 16:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2010-01-28 18:25 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2010-01-29 2:03 ` Wei Yongjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B61B047.10908@dev.6wind.com \
--to=nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).