From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vget.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:36:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B793FC8.1050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265854160-11763-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch series is based on Amerigo's v2 but it now uses a bitmap
> for port reservation.
>
> I've ran a while (1) { bind(0) } test (with ip_local_port_range
> 1024 65000) to see if there is any performance difference between the
> two approaches (ranges vs bitmap). I could not detect any significant
> difference, both cases scored in 2.76s +/- 0.01 on my setup.
>
> I've based this patch series on current net-next, but it contains a
> significant non networking part. Please let me know if I should handle
> this differently.
>
> Octavian Purdila (3):
> sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
> sysctl: add proc_dobitmap
> net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
>
(Sorry for the delay, we are having Chinese new year here.)
Thanks for your work, Octavian!
Your patches look nice, but I don't have much time to review them today,
I will have a detailed look tomorrow.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-15 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 2:09 [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] sysctl: add proc_dobitmap Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-15 12:36 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-02-15 12:39 ` [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] " Cong Wang
2010-02-15 12:37 ` Octavian Purdila
2010-02-15 12:48 ` Cong Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-11 2:55 Octavian Purdila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B793FC8.1050905@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vget.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).