From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:11:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7F993C.9000007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266532210-11536-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports which
> allows users to reserve ports for third-party applications.
>
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - switch the /proc entry format to coma separated list of range ports
> - treat -EFAULT just like any other error and acknowledge written values
> - use isdigit() in proc_get_ulong
>
> Octavian Purdila (3):
> sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
> sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap
> net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Hi,
This version looks fine for me, but I need to give them a test, and
I will put feedbacks asap. Thanks for your work!
Still two things:
1) bitops are always atomic on every arch, right? If yes, then ok.
2) I hope you could add some documentation to show the relations
between ip_local_port_range and ip_local_reserved_ports.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-20 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 22:30 [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-18 22:30 ` [net-next PATCH v5 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Octavian Purdila
2010-02-18 22:30 ` [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-20 8:20 ` Cong Wang
2010-02-20 13:27 ` Octavian Purdila
2010-02-21 2:00 ` Cong Wang
2010-02-21 6:38 ` Cong Wang
2010-02-20 8:11 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-02-20 13:57 ` [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] " Octavian Purdila
2010-02-21 1:58 ` Cong Wang
2010-02-21 6:10 ` Bill Fink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7F993C.9000007@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).