From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v3 4/5] rtnetlink: Add VF config code to rtnetlink Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:18:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4B864E67.6080302@trash.net> References: <20100210114303.14483.71368.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100210114403.14483.11004.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <4B72A061.40905@trash.net> <4B853468.10509@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "gospo@redhat.com" To: "Williams, Mitch A" Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:63412 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758870Ab0BYKSR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:18:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Williams, Mitch A wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@trash.net] > > [snip] > >> I just noticed the patch went in without any of these changes. >> Are you going to fix this up? > > I've got a patch in Jeff's queue that takes care of the low-hanging > fruit - return codes and excessive locking. You should see this go > up pretty quickly. > > I'm planning to look into the data structure changes today. Thanks for the information.