netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5]IPv6:netfilter: defrag:Introduce net namespace
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:36:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8660AD.7030308@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B85321B.1090003@trash.net>

Patrick McHardy wrote, at 02/24/2010 10:05 PM:
> Shan Wei wrote:
>> Alexey Dobriyan wrote, at 02/24/2010 03:48 PM:
>>>> -		.procname	= "nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout",
>>>> -		.data		= &nf_init_frags.timeout,
>>>> -		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
>>>> -		.mode		= 0644,
>>>> -		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
>>> Why are you removing sysctls?
>> Because, after introduced net namespace, we can use net->ipv6.frags to 
>> manage IPv6 conntrack fragment queue instead of nf_init_frags. 
>> And sysctls of ip6frag_low_thresh, ip6frag_time and ip6frag_high_thresh 
>> also can control IPv6 conntrack fragment queue.
>>
>> So, private member of nf_init_frags becomes redundant, and remove these sysctls. 
> 
> You can't simply remove them without a warning, people might be
> using them.

How to provide a warning to user?
How about handle these sysctl ABIs like this:

s1) Retain these sysctls and refer .data to appropriate member of frags of init_net.
    Take nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout for example, .data = &init_net.ipv6.frags.timeout.

s2) When register sysctls of conntrack ipv6 protocol in nf_ct_l3proto_register_sysctl(),
    print a waring like this.
    "nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout and ip6frag_time, nf_conntrack_frag6_low_thresh and ip6frag_low_thresh,
     nf_conntrack_frag6_high_thresh and ip6frag_high_thresh, the three sets are equivalent. 
     nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout is just an alias for ip6frag_time. The former Parameters of IPv6 conntrack
     will be removed in the future, please use the latter ones of IPv6."

s3) Describe these removable sysctl ABIs in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt


-- 
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-25 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-24  7:48 [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5]IPv6:netfilter: defrag:Introduce net namespace Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-24  8:26 ` Shan Wei
2010-02-24 14:05   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-25 11:36     ` Shan Wei [this message]
2010-02-25 17:34       ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B8660AD.7030308@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).