From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (bluetooth/hci_sysfs) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:08:21 -0800 Message-ID: <4B8C2CC5.8000603@oracle.com> References: <20100301210210.c6f465e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Marcel Holtmann , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Netdev To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:47292 "EHLO rcsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751315Ab0CAVIq (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:08:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100301210210.c6f465e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/01/10 02:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20100226: > > We are seeing conflicts migrate from being between 2 trees in linux-next > to be between a tree and Linus' tree as things start to get merged. > > > The net tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. static ssize_t inquiry_cache_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) { struct hci_dev *hdev = file->private_data; struct inquiry_cache *cache = &hdev->inq_cache; struct inquiry_entry *e; char buf[4096]; // <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< huh? don't do that on stack. int n = 0; -- ~Randy