* Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
[not found] ` <4B8D4607.8070603@xenotime.net>
@ 2010-03-03 9:23 ` David Miller
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-03-03 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rdunlap; +Cc: sfr, linux-next, linux-kernel, shemminger, bridge, netdev
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:08:23 -0800
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>
> br_multicast calls ip_send_check(), so it should depend on INET.
>
> built-in:
> br_multicast.c:(.text+0x88cf4): undefined reference to `ip_send_check'
>
> or modular:
> ERROR: "ip_send_check" [net/bridge/bridge.ko] undefined!
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Applied, but I almost lost this patch.
You need to CC: netdev on all networking patches so that it
gets properly tracked in patchwork and therefore does not get
lost.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
2010-03-03 9:23 ` [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET David Miller
@ 2010-03-04 3:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 4:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-04 8:42 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-03-04 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: rdunlap, sfr, linux-next, linux-kernel, shemminger, bridge,
netdev
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:08:23 -0800
>
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> >
> > br_multicast calls ip_send_check(), so it should depend on INET.
> >
> > built-in:
> > br_multicast.c:(.text+0x88cf4): undefined reference to `ip_send_check'
> >
> > or modular:
> > ERROR: "ip_send_check" [net/bridge/bridge.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>
> Applied, but I almost lost this patch.
>
> You need to CC: netdev on all networking patches so that it
> gets properly tracked in patchwork and therefore does not get
> lost.
I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev
as a second 'L:' line:
ETHERNET BRIDGE
M: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
L: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
S: Maintained
F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
F: net/bridge/
To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2010-03-04 4:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-04 8:42 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-03-04 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: David Miller, sfr, linux-next, linux-kernel, shemminger, bridge,
netdev
On 03/03/10 19:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
>> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:08:23 -0800
>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>>
>>> br_multicast calls ip_send_check(), so it should depend on INET.
>>>
>>> built-in:
>>> br_multicast.c:(.text+0x88cf4): undefined reference to `ip_send_check'
>>>
>>> or modular:
>>> ERROR: "ip_send_check" [net/bridge/bridge.ko] undefined!
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>
>> Applied, but I almost lost this patch.
>>
>> You need to CC: netdev on all networking patches so that it
>> gets properly tracked in patchwork and therefore does not get
>> lost.
>
> I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev
> as a second 'L:' line:
>
> ETHERNET BRIDGE
> M: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
> L: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
> W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
> S: Maintained
> F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
> F: net/bridge/
>
> To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches.
Ack that. I also expected Stephen to merge it...
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 4:00 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2010-03-04 8:42 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-03-04 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: rdunlap, sfr, linux-next, linux-kernel, shemminger, bridge,
netdev
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:18:47 +0100
> I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev
> as a second 'L:' line:
>
> ETHERNET BRIDGE
> M: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
> L: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
> W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
> S: Maintained
> F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
> F: net/bridge/
>
> To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches.
Thanks for pointing that out, I've made this addition.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-04 8:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20100302180915.1388d3f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <4B8D4607.8070603@xenotime.net>
2010-03-03 9:23 ` [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET David Miller
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 4:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-04 8:42 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).