From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel <lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c: Remove use of NIPQUAD
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:04:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9E68A0.3060405@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268672314.4027.46.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 17:20 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Joe Perches wrote:
>>> NIPQUAD has very few uses left.
>>> Remove this use and make the code have the identical form of the only
>>> other use of "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u" in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ftp.c
>> Are we trying to remove NIPQUAD?
>
> That is a goal for me yes.
> Elimination of unnecessary stuff from kernel.h is useful.
>
>> In my opinion the current code is
>> preferrable to open-coding NIPQUAD.
>
> $ grep -r --include=*.[ch] NIPQUAD *
> include/linux/kernel.h:#define NIPQUAD(addr) \
> include/linux/kernel.h:#define NIPQUAD_FMT "%u.%u.%u.%u"
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c: sprintf(buf, "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u", NIPQUAD(from.ip),
>
> As of right now NIPQUAD_FMT is unused and
> could be removed from kernel.h
>
> There's 1 use of NIPQUAD.
>
> Maybe instead of removal the #define could be
> moved to netfilter.h or netfilter_ipv4.h
>
> Another is to consolidate the two uses of
> "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u"
>
> $ grep -r --include=*.[ch] "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,u%" *
> fs/cachefiles/bind.c: _enter("{%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u},%s",
> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ftp.c: return snprintf(buffer, buflen, "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u",
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c: sprintf(buf, "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u", NIPQUAD(from.ip),
>
> Maybe these 2 open coded sprintf/snprintf could be
> consolidated and moved to an appropriate include
> like netfilter_ipv4 or another.
>
> What do you suggest?
Well, removing the last user sounds acceptable :) Applied, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 0:31 [PATCH] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c: Remove use of NIPQUAD Joe Perches
2010-03-09 4:08 ` Simon Horman
2010-03-15 16:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-15 16:58 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-15 17:04 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-03-15 19:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9E68A0.3060405@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).