netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:56:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA0FBB6.10208@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317145850.GA4257@gondor.apana.org.au>

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:16:21PM +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> The problem is if I have multipoint gre1 and policy that says
>> "encrypt all gre in transport mode".
>>
>> Thus for each public address, I get one bundle. But the
>> xfrm_lookup() is called for each packet because ipgre_tunnel_xmit()
>> calls ip_route_output_key() on per-packet basis.
>>
>> For my use-case it makes a huge difference.
> 
> But if your traffic switches between those tunnels on each packet,
> we're back to square one, right?

Not to my understanding. Why would it change?

>> Then we cannot maintain policy use time. But if it's not a
>> requirement, we could drop the policy from cache.
> 
> I don't see why we can't maintain the policy use time if we did
> this, all you need is a back-pointer from the top xfrm_dst.

Sure.

>> Also. With this and your recent flowi patch, I'm seeing pmtu
>> issues. Seems like xfrm_bundle_ok uses the original dst which
>> resulted in the creation of the bundle. Somehow that dst
>> does not get updated with pmtu... but the new dst used in
>> next xfrm_lookup for same target does have proper mtu.
>> I'm debugging right now why this is happening. Any ideas?
> 
> The dynamic MTU is always maintained in a normal dst object in
> the IPv4 routing cache.  Each xfrm_dst points to such a dst
> through xdst->route.
> 
> If you were looking at the xfrm_dst's own MTU then that may well
> cause problems.

I figured the root cause. The original dst gets expired
rt_genid goes old. But xfrm_dst does not notice that so it
won't create a new bundle. xfrm_bundle_ok calls dst_check,
but dst->obsolete = 0, and ipv4_dst_check is a no-op anyway.

Somehow the rtable object should be able to tell back to
xfrm that the dst is not good anymore. Any ideas?

- Timo



  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56       ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-17 16:32         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  0:31           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  5:48             ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  6:03               ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  6:21                 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  7:17                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:27                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  0:32           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:48   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  8:29     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  8:37       ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  8:47         ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  9:12           ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  9:32             ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  9:53               ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21  0:46                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21  7:34                       ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21  8:31                         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22  3:52                           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03                             ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  7:28                               ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  7:42                                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23  9:19                                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  9:41                                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  1:26                   ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:28                   ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:32                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  1:36                       ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:40                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  3:12                           ` David Miller
2010-03-22  3:52                             ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31                               ` Timo Teräs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA0FBB6.10208@iki.fi \
    --to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).