From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:56:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA0FBB6.10208@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317145850.GA4257@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:16:21PM +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> The problem is if I have multipoint gre1 and policy that says
>> "encrypt all gre in transport mode".
>>
>> Thus for each public address, I get one bundle. But the
>> xfrm_lookup() is called for each packet because ipgre_tunnel_xmit()
>> calls ip_route_output_key() on per-packet basis.
>>
>> For my use-case it makes a huge difference.
>
> But if your traffic switches between those tunnels on each packet,
> we're back to square one, right?
Not to my understanding. Why would it change?
>> Then we cannot maintain policy use time. But if it's not a
>> requirement, we could drop the policy from cache.
>
> I don't see why we can't maintain the policy use time if we did
> this, all you need is a back-pointer from the top xfrm_dst.
Sure.
>> Also. With this and your recent flowi patch, I'm seeing pmtu
>> issues. Seems like xfrm_bundle_ok uses the original dst which
>> resulted in the creation of the bundle. Somehow that dst
>> does not get updated with pmtu... but the new dst used in
>> next xfrm_lookup for same target does have proper mtu.
>> I'm debugging right now why this is happening. Any ideas?
>
> The dynamic MTU is always maintained in a normal dst object in
> the IPv4 routing cache. Each xfrm_dst points to such a dst
> through xdst->route.
>
> If you were looking at the xfrm_dst's own MTU then that may well
> cause problems.
I figured the root cause. The original dst gets expired
rt_genid goes old. But xfrm_dst does not notice that so it
won't create a new bundle. xfrm_bundle_ok calls dst_check,
but dst->obsolete = 0, and ipv4_dst_check is a no-op anyway.
Somehow the rtable object should be able to tell back to
xfrm that the dst is not good anymore. Any ideas?
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-17 16:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:31 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 5:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 6:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 6:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 8:37 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:12 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 9:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:53 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 0:46 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21 7:34 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 8:31 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:28 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:42 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23 9:19 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:28 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:36 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:40 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 3:12 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA0FBB6.10208@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).