From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:48:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA32C41.2020000@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319072053.GA22913@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:20:10PM +0200, Timo Teras wrote:
>> - policy = flow_cache_lookup(net, fl, dst_orig->ops->family,
>> - dir, xfrm_policy_lookup);
>> - err = PTR_ERR(policy);
>> - if (IS_ERR(policy)) {
>> - XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTPOLERROR);
>> - goto dropdst;
>> + fce = flow_cache_lookup(&net->xfrm.flow_cache,
>> + fl, family, dir);
>> + if (fce == NULL)
>> + goto no_cache;
>> +
>> + xf = container_of(fce, struct xfrm_flow_cache_entry, fce);
>> + xfrm_flow_cache_entry_validate(&net->xfrm.flow_cache, fce);
>
> This doesn't work.
>
> The flow cache operates without locking as it is a per-cpu cache.
> To make this work you must ensure that you stay on the same CPU
> or use some other form of synchronoisation if you write to the
> object returned.
>
> AFAICS there is no synchronisation here and you're writing to fce.
>
> So you'll need to disable preemption around the bit that touches
> fce.
But flow_cache_lookup disables pre-emption until _put is called.
So it should work. Would there be a cleaner way?
However, now I figured that we need to make walk.dead atomic
because it's read some times without taking the policy lock.
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 16:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:31 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 5:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 6:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 6:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:48 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-19 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 8:37 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:12 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 9:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:53 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 0:46 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21 7:34 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 8:31 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:28 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:42 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23 9:19 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:28 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:36 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:40 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 3:12 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA32C41.2020000@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).