netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:12:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA33FF5.8010104@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319084717.GA23567@gondor.apana.org.au>

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:37:58AM +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> But I changed that. the flow cache now does *not* call local_bh_enable
>> if it returns something. This is deferred until corresponding _put
>> call. So bh's are disable while we are touching the lookup results.
> 
> I'm sorry but making a function like flow_cache_lookup return with
> BH disabled is just wrong!
> 
>> It'd probably make sense to remove that. And require _lookup to
>> be called with bh disabled so it's more obvious that bh's are
>> disabled when touching the cache entry.
> 
> That would be better but it's still hacky.  Proper reference
> counting like we had before would be my preference.

Well, the cache entry is still referenced only very shortly,
I don't see why keeping bh disabled why doing it is considered
a hack. Refcounting the cache entries is trickier. Though,
it could be used to optimize the update process: we could safely
update it instead of doing now lookup later.

>> Not a race. We need to keep bh's disabled while touching fce
>> for various reasons.
> 
> What are those reasons (apart from this race)?

This. And that the cache is synchronized by flow_cache_flush
executing stuff on other cpu's, ensuring that it's not running
any protected cache accessing code. See below.

> 
>> Noone. When policy and dst is on cache there's no reference.
>> The cache generation id's ensure that the object exists when
>> they are in cache. It might make sense to add references to
>> both objects and do a BUG_ON if the flow cache flusher would
>> need to delete an object. I guess this would be the proper
>> way, since that's how the dst stuff works too.
> 
> The cache genid is not enough:
> 
> CPU1			CPU2
> check genid == OK
> 			update genid
> 			kill policy
> 			kfree on policy
> use policy == BOOM

The sequence goes currently.

CPU1			CPU2
disable_bh
check genid == OK
			update genid
			call cache_flush
			blocks
use policy == OK
and take refcount
enable_bh
cache_flush smpcall executes and ublocks cpu2
			returns from cache_flush
			kill policy
			kfree on policy

- Timo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56       ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 16:32         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  0:31           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  5:48             ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  6:03               ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  6:21                 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  7:17                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:27                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  0:32           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  7:48   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  8:29     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  8:37       ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19  8:47         ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  9:12           ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-19  9:32             ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19  9:53               ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21  0:46                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21  7:34                       ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21  8:31                         ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22  3:52                           ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03                             ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  7:28                               ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  7:42                                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23  9:19                                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23  9:41                                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  1:26                   ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:28                   ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:32                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  1:36                       ` David Miller
2010-03-22  1:40                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22  3:12                           ` David Miller
2010-03-22  3:52                             ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31                               ` Timo Teräs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA33FF5.8010104@iki.fi \
    --to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).