From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:12:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA33FF5.8010104@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319084717.GA23567@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:37:58AM +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> But I changed that. the flow cache now does *not* call local_bh_enable
>> if it returns something. This is deferred until corresponding _put
>> call. So bh's are disable while we are touching the lookup results.
>
> I'm sorry but making a function like flow_cache_lookup return with
> BH disabled is just wrong!
>
>> It'd probably make sense to remove that. And require _lookup to
>> be called with bh disabled so it's more obvious that bh's are
>> disabled when touching the cache entry.
>
> That would be better but it's still hacky. Proper reference
> counting like we had before would be my preference.
Well, the cache entry is still referenced only very shortly,
I don't see why keeping bh disabled why doing it is considered
a hack. Refcounting the cache entries is trickier. Though,
it could be used to optimize the update process: we could safely
update it instead of doing now lookup later.
>> Not a race. We need to keep bh's disabled while touching fce
>> for various reasons.
>
> What are those reasons (apart from this race)?
This. And that the cache is synchronized by flow_cache_flush
executing stuff on other cpu's, ensuring that it's not running
any protected cache accessing code. See below.
>
>> Noone. When policy and dst is on cache there's no reference.
>> The cache generation id's ensure that the object exists when
>> they are in cache. It might make sense to add references to
>> both objects and do a BUG_ON if the flow cache flusher would
>> need to delete an object. I guess this would be the proper
>> way, since that's how the dst stuff works too.
>
> The cache genid is not enough:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> check genid == OK
> update genid
> kill policy
> kfree on policy
> use policy == BOOM
The sequence goes currently.
CPU1 CPU2
disable_bh
check genid == OK
update genid
call cache_flush
blocks
use policy == OK
and take refcount
enable_bh
cache_flush smpcall executes and ublocks cpu2
returns from cache_flush
kill policy
kfree on policy
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 16:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:31 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 5:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 6:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 6:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 8:37 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:12 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-19 9:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:53 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 0:46 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21 7:34 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 8:31 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:28 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:42 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23 9:19 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:28 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:36 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:40 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 3:12 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA33FF5.8010104@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).