From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA5CC16.9040606@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100321004659.GA5895@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:26:00PM +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> So should go ahead and:
>> 1. modify flow cache to be more generic (have virtual put and get
>> for each object; and remove the atomic_t pointer)
>> 2. modify flow cache to have slow and fast resolvers so we can
>> copy with the current sleeping requirement
>
> I don't think we need either of these. To support the sleep
> requirement, just return -EAGAIN from the resolver when the
> template can't be resolved. Then the caller of flow_cache_lookup
> can sleep as it does now. It simply has to repeat the flow
> cache lookup afterwards.
Ok, we can do that to skip 2. But I think 1 would be still useful.
It'd probably be good to actually have flow_cache_ops pointer in
each entry instead of the atomic_t pointer.
The reasoning:
- we can then have type-based checks that the reference count
is valid (e.g. policy's refcount must not go to zero, it's bug,
and we can call dst_release which warns if refcount goes to
negative); imho it's hack to call atomic_dec instead of the
real type's xxx_put
- the flow cache needs to somehow know if the entry is stale so
it'll try to refresh it atomically; e.g. if there's no
check for 'stale', the lookup returns stale xfrm_dst. we'd
then need new api to update the stale entry, or flush it out
and repeat the lookup. the virtual get could check for it being
stale (if so release the entry) and then return null for the
generic code to call the resolver atomically
- for paranoia we can actually check the type of the object in
cache via the ops (if needed)
>> 3. cache bundles instead of policies for outgoing stuff
>> 4. kill find_bundle and just instantiate new ones if we get cache
>> miss
>> 5. put all bundles to global hlist (since only place that walks
>> through them is gc, and stale bundle can be dst_free'd right
>> away); use genid's for policy to flush old bundles
>> 6. dst_free and unlink bundle immediately if it's found to be stale
>
> Sounds good.
Okay. Sounds like a plan. I'll work on this next week.
I'll also try to make it a series of patches instead of the big
hunk I sent initially.
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-21 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 12:20 [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-17 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 14:16 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 14:58 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-17 15:56 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-17 16:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-18 19:30 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:31 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 5:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 6:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 6:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 0:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:20 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 7:48 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 8:37 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 8:47 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:12 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-19 9:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-19 9:53 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-20 15:17 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-20 16:26 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-21 0:46 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-21 7:34 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-21 8:31 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:03 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:28 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 7:42 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-23 9:19 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-23 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:28 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:32 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 1:36 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 1:40 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 3:12 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-22 18:31 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA5CC16.9040606@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).