From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: michal.simek@petalogix.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
John Linn <John.Linn@xilinx.com>,
"Steven J. Magnani" <steve@digidescorp.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Network performance - iperf
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:57:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB0DBFD.30904@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB0D9A1.3090107@hp.com>
Rick Jones wrote:
> I don't know how to set fixed socket buffer sizes in iperf, if you were
> running netperf though I would suggest fixing the socket buffer sizes
> with the test-specific -s (affects local) and -S (affects remote) options:
>
> netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H <remote> -l 30 -- -s 32K -S 32K -m 32K
>
> to test the hypothesis that the autotuning of the socket buffers/window
> size is allowing the windows to grow in the larger memory cases beyond
> what the TLB in your processor is comfortable with.
BTW, by default, netperf will allocate a "ring" of send buffers - the number
allocated will be one more than the socket buffer size divided by the send size
- so in the example above, there will be two 32KB buffers allocated in netperf's
send ring. A similar calculation may happen on the receive side.
That can be controlled via the global (before the "--") -W option.
-W send,recv Set the number of send,recv buffers
So, you might make the netperf command:
netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H <remote> -l 30 -W 1,1 -- -s 32K -S 32K -m 32K
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-29 11:33 Network performance - iperf Michal Simek
2010-03-29 12:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29 14:54 ` Michal Simek
2010-03-29 15:27 ` Michal Simek
2010-03-29 17:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-30 9:34 ` Michal Simek
2010-03-30 12:11 ` Steve Magnani
2010-03-30 12:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29 16:47 ` Rick Jones
2010-03-29 16:57 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2010-03-29 20:07 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB0DBFD.30904@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=John.Linn@xilinx.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve@digidescorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).