netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:06:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB872CF.2030202@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100404110014.GA10864@gondor.apana.org.au>

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 01:50:16PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> Because flow_cache_entry is per-cpu, and multiple entries (due to
>> different flows matching same policies, or same flow having multiple
>> per-cpu entries) can point to same policy. If we cached "dummy" objects
>> for even policies, then this would be better approach.
> 
> Oh yes of course.
> 
> But what we could do is embed most of flow_cache_entry into
> xfrm_policy (and xdst in your latter patches) along with the
> ops pointer.
> 
> Like this:
> 
> struct flow_cache_object {
> 	u16			family;
> 	u8			dir;
> 	u32			genid;
> 	struct flowi		key;
> 	struct flow_cache_ops **ops;
> };
> 
> struct flow_cache_entry {
> 	struct flow_cache_entry	*next;
> 	struct flow_cache_object *obj;
> };
> 
> struct xfrm_policy {
> 	struct flow_cache_object flo;
> 	...
> };
> 
> What do you think?

It would still not work for policies. For every policy X we
can get N+1 different matches with separate struct flowi contents.
It's not possible to put single struct flowi or any other of
the flow details in to xfrm_policy. It's a N-to-1 mapping. Not
a 1-to-1 mapping.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-04 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-01 12:52 [PATCH 0/4] caching bundles, iteration 3 Timo Teras
2010-04-01 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods Timo Teras
2010-04-01 13:05   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-01 13:07     ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-03  3:38   ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-03  8:36     ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-03 13:50       ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-03 14:17         ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-03 14:26           ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-03 15:53             ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-03 20:19               ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-04  2:06                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04  5:50                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-04  5:58                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04  6:07                       ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-04  6:19                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04  6:28                           ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-04  8:35                             ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04 10:42   ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04 10:50     ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-04 11:00       ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04 11:06         ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-04-04 11:26           ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04 11:31             ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-04 12:09               ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-01 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfrm: cache bundles instead of policies for outgoing flows Timo Teras
2010-04-01 12:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy garbage collection Timo Teras
2010-04-01 12:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] flow: delayed deletion of flow cache entries Timo Teras
2010-04-02  3:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] caching bundles, iteration 3 David Miller
2010-04-02 13:12   ` Herbert Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-05  7:00 [PATCH 0/4] caching bundles, iteration 4 Timo Teras
2010-04-05  7:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods Timo Teras
2010-04-05  8:33   ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-05  8:36     ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-05  8:44       ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-05  8:49         ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-05  8:53           ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-05  9:12             ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-05 17:01               ` Timo Teras
2010-04-06 12:34                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-06 13:26                   ` Timo Teräs
2010-04-07  9:15                     ` David Miller
2010-04-07 10:30 [PATCH 0/4] caching bundles, iteration 5 Timo Teras
2010-04-07 10:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] flow: virtualize flow cache entry methods Timo Teras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BB872CF.2030202@iki.fi \
    --to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).