From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
"bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [v2 Patch 3/3] bonding: make bonding support netpoll
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:20:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBC0811.6000203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70501020920527933@unknownmsgid>
Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:38:16PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>> Cong Wang wrote:
>>>>> Before I try to reproduce it, could you please try to replace
>>>>> the 'read_lock()'
>>>>> in slaves_support_netpoll() with 'read_lock_bh()'? (read_unlock()
>>>>> too) Try if this helps.
>>>>>
>>>> Confirmed. Please use the attached patch instead, for your testing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>> Moving those locks to bh-locks will not resolve this. I tried that
>>> yesterday and tried your new patch today without success. That
>>> warning
>>> is a WARN_ON_ONCE so you need to reboot to see that it is still a
>>> problem. Simply unloading and loading the new module is not an
>>> accurate
>>> test.
>>> Also, my system still hangs when removing the bonding module. I do
>>> not
>>> think you intended to fix this with the patch, but wanted it to be
>>> clear
>>> to everyone on the list.
>>
>> Actually I did reboot and then tested the module. I didn't get any
>> warning.
>> I just tried again today, and no warnings at all.
>>
>> For removing bonding module, you may need another fix of mine,
>> which is to fix a potential deadlock of workqueue. Try:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/1/58
>>
>>> You should also configure your kernel with a some of the lock
>>> debugging
>>> enabled. I've been using the following:
>>> CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
>>> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
>>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
>>> CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y
>>
>> Sure, I always keep these.
>>
>>> Here is the output when I remove a slave from the bond. My
>>> xmit_roundrobin patch from earlier (replacing read_lock with
>>> read_trylock) was applied. It might be helpful for you when
>>> debugging
>>> these issues.
>>
>> I don't apply your patch, just tested my patch.
>>
>>> Dead loop on virtual device bond0, fix it urgently!
>> Please provide your bonding configuration and steps to reproduce it.
>>
>
> My first response in this thread provides the commands and
> configuration needed to reproduce this.
Then I should do the right thing.
>
>> What I did is:
>>
>> 1. Load bonding module with "mode=0 miimon=100"
>> 2. Enslave eth0 and active bond0
>> 3. Load netconsole and send messages via bond0
>> 4. Remove eth0 from bond0
>> 5. Remove bonding module
>> 6. Remove netconsole module
>
> Thanks for sending your configuration.
>
> What values are in /proc/sys/kernel/printk?
>
I use default values on RHEL5:
6 4 1 7
I don't think this is related with loglevel, what I checked
is dmesg, not just the console screen.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-05 9:12 [v2 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices Amerigo Wang
2010-04-05 9:12 ` [v2 Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll Amerigo Wang
2010-04-05 9:12 ` [v2 Patch 3/3] bonding: make bonding " Amerigo Wang
2010-04-05 19:43 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-04-06 2:43 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-06 4:38 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-06 14:48 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-04-07 2:32 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-07 4:02 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-04-07 4:20 ` Cong Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBC0811.6000203@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).